This was an interesting article. Our company TinyTales.Press uses AI to generate our characters and, a few times, to write about their imaginary backgrounds. We don't do rocket science. We also use AI for graphics. It's taken hundreds of hours of bot training to achieve the Wow factor finally we think kids want to engage with.
You asked the Question: "How can we determine if someone or something is self-aware? How can we truly know if a machine—or even a human—is conscious?" I don't think we want them to be consious. We want HI to be incharge. PERIOD.
Thank you. When I look at the current world situation I am not sure that it is the best idea that only HI is in charge, a little help would not be a bad thing.
The more one interacts with AI, the more it becomes clear that AI has its limitations and repetitions. I have played a lot with ChatGPT for the fun of it, until it stopped answering to me for some reason 🤷. Perhaps at some point my VPN was also blocking it, feeling its limitations and occasional lies :). Nowadays, I prefer Perplexity, since I got a free one year pro version as a perk from LinkedIn.
I use Perplexity for simple tasks, brainstorming and as high level assistant. I know the language AI uses and I immediately detect it when reading others. I am also suspicious of the sources it gives, so I always check the citations or any links it provides. Overall it does make my work easier, but I would never quit old fashioned writing.
When I enter the creative flow my mind works wonders and no AI can replicate the language, energy and emotion I infuse my writing with.
So I agree with @DR Rawson too, that we want HI to be in charge!
HI brings in the magic, AI will only assist with some tasks, especially the automation part.
Very true, for me I prefer to do my own research and own writing. I like creativity sparked by a flower, nature, the elements and not by AI, yet we are all different and different things work for different people. It is interesting to see the evolution not something we ever thought possible 100 years ago. I could see my grandmother saying what is going on this is so confusing, why my radio talks to me?
This was an interesting article. Our company TinyTales.Press uses AI to generate our characters and, a few times, to write about their imaginary backgrounds. We don't do rocket science. We also use AI for graphics. It's taken hundreds of hours of bot training to achieve the Wow factor finally we think kids want to engage with.
You asked the Question: "How can we determine if someone or something is self-aware? How can we truly know if a machine—or even a human—is conscious?" I don't think we want them to be consious. We want HI to be incharge. PERIOD.
Thank you. When I look at the current world situation I am not sure that it is the best idea that only HI is in charge, a little help would not be a bad thing.
OK, a little. LOL
I love the images created for Tiny Tales DR.
When you see the children respond, then you know the time you took to create it was worthwhile.
The more one interacts with AI, the more it becomes clear that AI has its limitations and repetitions. I have played a lot with ChatGPT for the fun of it, until it stopped answering to me for some reason 🤷. Perhaps at some point my VPN was also blocking it, feeling its limitations and occasional lies :). Nowadays, I prefer Perplexity, since I got a free one year pro version as a perk from LinkedIn.
I use Perplexity for simple tasks, brainstorming and as high level assistant. I know the language AI uses and I immediately detect it when reading others. I am also suspicious of the sources it gives, so I always check the citations or any links it provides. Overall it does make my work easier, but I would never quit old fashioned writing.
When I enter the creative flow my mind works wonders and no AI can replicate the language, energy and emotion I infuse my writing with.
So I agree with @DR Rawson too, that we want HI to be in charge!
HI brings in the magic, AI will only assist with some tasks, especially the automation part.
Definitely, the magic of creation is like love itself.
Very true, for me I prefer to do my own research and own writing. I like creativity sparked by a flower, nature, the elements and not by AI, yet we are all different and different things work for different people. It is interesting to see the evolution not something we ever thought possible 100 years ago. I could see my grandmother saying what is going on this is so confusing, why my radio talks to me?
So AI is a liar. Lol. isn't a human trait.
Very true...